Case Report Pediatr Neurosurg 2001;35:94–98 Received: September 13, 2000 Accepted: May 14, 2001 Ruptured Intracranial Mycotic Aneurysm: An Unusual Infectious Complication following Craniofacial Surgery Christopher M. Uchiyama Douglas L. Brockmeyer W. Bruce Cherny John J. Jacobs Marion L. Walker Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine and Primary Children’s Medical Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA Key Words Mycotic aneurysm W Infectious aneurysm W Craniofacial surgery W Apert syndrome Abstract The case of a child with Apert syndrome is presented in which the development and rupture of an intracranial mycotic aneurysm occurred secondary to multiple infectious complications following craniofacial surgery. An endovascular procedure was utilized in an attempt to embolize the aneurysm and parent vessel. The patient recovered from her infections, but retained a residual right hemiparesis and left cranial nerve III palsy at the time of discharge. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a mycotic aneurysm developing after a craniofacial procedure. Risk factors leading to aneurysm formation in this case are presented, as well as a literature review of neurological complications following craniofacial surgery. Copyright © 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel ABC © 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel 1016–2291/01/0352–0094$17.50/0 Fax + 41 61 306 12 34 E-Mail karger@karger.ch www.karger.com Accessible online at: www.karger.com/journals/pne Introduction The term mycotic aneurysm refers to a saccular or fusiform-like arterial dilatation resulting from an infectious process affecting an arterial wall. Mycotic aneurysms tend to be located on vessels distal to the circle of Willis with branches of the middle cerebral artery most commonly affected [1–4]. They presumably arise as the result of one of the following four mechanisms: lodging of septic emboli into the lumen of an intracranial vessel, hematogenous seeding from a distant infection to a vessel via the vasa vasorum or rete vasorum, local invasion of an intracranial vessel by direct spread of an adjacent infection, or direct microbial contamination of an arterial wall following penetrating trauma [3, 5–11]. Invasion of the affected vessel by a pathogen subsequently causes weakening or destruction of the elastica and media resulting in an aneurysm defect [12]. Contrary to what its name may suggest, bacterial rather than fungal etiologies of mycotic aneurysms predominate with Staphylococcus and Streptococcus species being the most common pathogens associated with this disease [2, 13–15]. In this report, risk factors leading to mycotic aneurysm development following a craniofacial procedure are discussed. The endovascular approach for treating this aneurysm is described and a brief literature review of neurological complications following craniofacial surgery will be presented. Christopher M. Uchiyama, MD, PhD Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Utah 50 North Medical Drive, Suite 3B409 SOM Salt Lake City, UT 84132 (USA) Tel. +1 801 581 6908, Fax +1 801 581 4385 Case Report A 5-year-old female with Apert syndrome presented with midface deficiency and craniosynostoses. She underwent a differential frontoorbital, intracranial LeFort III and LeFort I advancement for correction of her craniofacial abnormalities. Intravenous cefuroxime (25 mg/kg every 8 h) was administered throughout the case. Her intraoperative course was complicated by a maxillary artery laceration causing hemorrhage requiring a 4,000-ml transfusion of whole blood. Additionally, the loss of an adequate endotracheal airway necessitated the emergent placement of a tracheostomy during surgery. Bilateral subgaleal Jackson-Pratt drains were placed at the conclusion of the case. Postoperatively, the patient developed a bleeding diathesis which resolved following administration of fresh-frozen plasma within the first 24 h after surgery. The patient remained on cefuroxime for several days postoperatively. On postoperative day 4, the patient became febrile to 39.5 ° C and blood cultures obtained at that time grew Candida albicans. Amphotericin B (0.9 mg/kg) was started but she continued to remain febrile over the next few days despite negative cultures from blood, urine and pulmonary sources. A contrast-enhanced computer tomography (CT) scan was then performed on postoperative day 6 which showed a left-sided subgaleal fluid collection with minimal dural enhancement. Due to concerns of an infected subgaleal hematoma and possible meningitis, the subgaleal hematoma was tapped. Culture results demonstrated the presence of Streptococcus viridans and group G Streptococcus species. The cefuroxime was discontinued and the patient was started on broad-spectrum antibiotics. The patient was taken back to the operating room on postoperative day 7 where she underwent an evacuation of her infected subgaleal fluid collection, debridement of the operative site and removal of an infected frontal bone flap. Cultures of the infected subgaleal hematoma obtained at surgery revealed a multitude of aerobic, anaerobic and fungal organisms. Besides the two previously cultured Streptococcus species, other organisms including Escherichia coli, Candida glabrata, Veillonella species, Bacteroides gracillus and Peptostreptococcus organisms were also identified. Postoperatively the patient was placed on appropriate intravenous broad-spectrum antibiotics based on organism sensitivities and on postoperative days 11/41 also began a 10-day course of continuous bacitracin irrigations (500 units/ml at 50 cm3/h) to the operative site via bilateral, subgaleal Jackson-Pratt drains. Following the wound debridement procedure, the patient had episodes of hemodynamic instability due to septic shock requiring fluid resuscitation and pressor support from which she was eventually withdrawn. The patient continued to spike fevers and sequential workups demonstrated a C. albicans urinary tract infection. Additionally, a recurrence of C. albicans line sepsis was treated appropriately with combinations of antifungal agents. Despite these infectious episodes, the patient remained neurologically stable and continued to follow commands with symmetrical motor function. A follow-up head CT scan on postoperative days 13/61 showed no new abnormalities. On postoperative days 16/91, the patient acutely developed a fixed dilated left pupil, was unresponsive to commands, and had a dense right-sided hemiparesis. An emergency head CT scan showed a 5 ! 5 ! 5 cm left temporal lobe intracerebral hematoma with left lateral ventricle compression and Fig. 1. CT scan performed at the time of acute neurological deterioration demonstrates large, left temporal intraparenchymal hemorrhage from ruptured mycotic aneurysm causing mass effect and uncal herniation. The numerator denotes postoperative day from initial craniofacial procedure and the denominator indicates postoperative day from wound debridement procedure. mass effect causing uncal herniation (fig. 1). The patient was immediately taken to the operating room where she underwent a craniotomy and evacuation of the hematoma. Due to the patient’s multitude of antecedent infections and location of clot on CT scan, a ruptured intracranial mycotic aneurysm as the etiology of her hemorrhage was suspected. This was subsequently confirmed on a postoperative cerebral angiogram showing a 4- to 5-mm aneurysm arising from an early anterior temporal branch of the left middle cerebral artery (fig. 2a). An attempt to embolize the vessel was then undertaken with the goal of occluding the aneurysm and the proximal anterior temporal artery branch. A 5-Fr Berenstein catheter was positioned into the left internal carotid artery, and under live subtraction with ‘road-mapping’, a Tracker 10 microcatheter was advanced into the vessel supplying the aneurysm. A suspension of 0.5 cm3 of N-butyl-cyanoacrylate glue mixed with 0.25 cm3 of Ethiodol and a small amount of tantalum powder for opacification was then injected. During the procedure, occlusion of the left middle cerebral artery occurred due to an intimal flap and/or vasospasm. Multiple attempts to angioplasty the affected vessel were unsuccessful. However, at the conclusion of the procedure, a repeat angiogram demonstrated spontaneous recanalization of the proximal aspect of the middle cerebral artery and no filling of the aneurysm. Therefore, the presumed mechanism for middle cerebral artery occlusion appeared to be acute vasospasm and not dissection or emboli. An angiogram performed the following day demonstrated a patent middle cerebral artery and obliteration of the vessel supplying the lesion with no detectable aneurysm (fig. 2b). No additional aneurysms were noted in the remainder of the cerebral vascu- Mycotic Aneurysm Pediatr Neurosurg 2001;35:94–98 1 95 lature. Early in the postembolization period, the patient developed a left hemispheric infarction in the distribution of the left middle cerebral artery. The patient eventually recovered to her baseline level of cognitive function. She continued to make clinical improvements daily, but retained a left cranial nerve III palsy and a right hemiparesis prior to her discharge home. Discussion Fig. 2. a Cerebral angiogram following left internal carotid artery injection reveals 4- to 5-mm saccular aneurysm arising distal on an early anterior temporal branch of the left middle cerebral artery (black arrow). b Postembolization angiogram showing obliteration of mycotic aneurysm and distal segment of parent vessel (double arrows). Following procedure, bilateral anterior cerebral arteries showed loss of perfusion via left carotid artery (heavy black arrow), but showed adequate cross-filling from the contralateral side (not shown). 96 Pediatr Neurosurg 2001;35:94–98 In this patient, the multiplicity of bacterial and fungal infections arising in the subgaleal compartment, lungs, urinary tract and blood of this patient, was a major factor in suspecting a ruptured mycotic aneurysm at the time of her acute neurological changes. Several factors contributed to the development of infections and a mycotic aneurysm in this patient. First, the large intraoperative blood loss and multiple blood transfusions she received placed her in an immunocompromised state predisposing her to subsequent postoperative infections. Secondly, the craniofacial procedure performed violates the mucoperiosteal barrier, exposes the intracranial compartment to oronasal flora, and increases the duration of surgery. These are known to be associated with a higher risk of infection compared to staged procedures where extra- and intracranial compartments are generally kept separate, and the duration of surgery is shorter [16]. The need for an emergent intraoperative tracheostomy further contributed to exposure of intracranial compartments to microbial flora of the upper airway. Not surprisingly, organisms normally found in the oro- and nasopharynx were isolated from the subgaleal cultured specimens. In reviewing the radiographic findings and the favorable location of the aneurysm, treatment options considered were continued antibiotic therapy plus either surgical management by ligation of the parent vessel proximal to the aneurysm, or endovascular embolization of the aneurysm and proximal artery. The latter approach was utilized but the procedure was complicated by acute vasospasm. The aneurysm and affected parent vessel were occluded and patency of the middle cerebral artery was re-established as demonstrated by the angiogram obtained the following day. The patient subsequently convalesced from her left middle cerebral artery stroke and retained the cranial nerve and motor deficits which were preoperatively observed at the time of her acute hemorrhage. A number of general, retrospective reviews address complications following craniofacial surgical procedures. Murray et al. [17] summarized a 20-year experience on 385 craniofacial operations performed on 264 patients for Uchiyama/Brockmeyer/Cherny/Jacobs/ Walker a variety of congenital deformities. An overall complication rate of 30% was reported, mostly due to infection or loss of bone grafts and 1 patient (0.38%) died from respiratory arrest. Neurological complications encountered included cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks in 6 patients (2.2%), and unilateral blindness in 2 patients (0.75%). Matthews [18] reported his complications following craniofacial surgery on 46 patients over a 6-year period. An overall complication rate is unable to be ascertained from this report. However, of the neurological complications described, persistent CSF leaks were seen as late complications in 3 patients, with subsequent development of meningitis in 1 of these patients. Additionally, anosmia in 1 patient, and diabetes insipidus in 2 patients were observed. Cerebral edema was the reported cause of death in 1 of 2 mortalities encountered, and was apparently due to SIADH (syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone) from brain retraction. Siegel and Israele [19] reported their experience in 219 children undergoing either oromaxillary or craniofacial surgery for congenital anomalies over a 10-year period. Of the infectious complications involving the central nervous system per se, 1 patient (0.45%) developed an epidural abscess, 1 patient (0.45%) developed a frontal abscess, and 4 patients (1.8%) developed either meningitis, ventriculitis or a combination of both. Like our patient, 3 of their 5 patients with subgaleal fluid infection developed sepsis, meningitis or osteomyelitis. This anecdotal evidence may imply additional serious infectious risks in patients with subgaleal infections following craniofacial surgery. Also similar to our own experience, surgical removal of infected bone grafts was necessary to resolve osteomyelitis in 6 of their 10 patients. Although Siegel and Israele [19] focused on infectious complications following surgery, noninfectious complications were briefly noted as well. Neurological complications were seen in 19 patients (8.7%) with the majority of these being comprised of CSF leaks (13 patients). The remainder included 2 patients with seizures (due to cerebral edema in 1 patient and SIADH-induced hyponatremia in the other), diabetes insipidus in 1 patient, 2 additional patients with SIADH-induced hyponatremia, and a hypotonic bladder in 1 patient. Unrelated to the initial craniofacial procedure was the development of an intracranial hemorrhage following ventriculostomy in another patient who had required intrathecal access to treat his meningitis and ventriculitis. In the largest review of complications associated with craniofacial surgery, Whitaker et al. [16] summarized their experience with 793 surgical procedures in 6 centers over a 10-year period. An overall 16.5% complication rate and a 1.6% death rate was noted. Of these cases, the following neurological complications were noted: CSF leaks in 9 patients (1.1%), visual changes (i.e., transient and permanent blindness and decreased visual acuity) in 3 patients (0.38%), sixth nerve palsies in ‘several’ patients, seventh nerve palsy in 1 patient (0.13%), and meningitis in 1 patient (0.13%). Of note, there were no morbid complications of ‘brain damage’ following these 793 procedures, however, 1 of the 13 mortalities encountered was attributed to cerebral edema. Finally, Wolfe et al. [20] reviewed complications in 29 patients (17 of which were Apert’s patients) who underwent either a midfacial or frontofacial advancement. In his series, no CSF leaks were encountered and the only significant neurological complication was a fungal epidural abscess in 1 patient. Furthermore, no instances of intracranial hemorrhage from a ruptured mycotic aneurysm following craniofacial surgery have been described making this report the first of such an occurrence. In short, this literature review suggests that the majority of complications following craniofacial surgery are due to CSF leakage and the remainder are relatively uncommon in occurrence. Mycotic Aneurysm Pediatr Neurosurg 2001;35:94–98 Conclusion This case illustrates the difficult and complex nature of managing intracranial mycotic aneurysms, particularly in children. It also emphasizes the need for vigilant neurological exams in the setting of a critically ill, surgical patient with prolonged infectious complications. This is often difficult since many patients may be intubated, heavily sedated and chemically paralyzed, thus prohibiting even the most basic of neurological exams. Furthermore, the necessary practice of tarsorrhaphy during some craniofacial procedures, unfortunately, eliminates the ability to perform a simple but informative pupillary exam in the postoperative period. The importance of the pupillary exam is illustrated in this report as the recognition of an acute intracranial hemorrhage was promptly made in a sedated, intubated patient when she was found to have a unilateral fixed and dilated pupil. Intracranial hemorrhages and ruptured mycotic aneurysms will no doubt continue to constitute a rare, postoperative risk following craniofacial procedures. However, because patients can quickly deteriorate, die, or sustain irreversible neurological injury following these events, their prompt recognition and treatment is essential. 97 References 1 Baldwin HZ, Zabramski JM, Spetzler R: Infectious intracranial aneurysms; in Carter LP, Spetzler RF (eds): Neurovascular Surgery. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1995, pp 777–888. 2 Ojemann RG: Surgical management of bacterial intracranial aneurysms; in Schmidek HH, Sweet WH (eds): Operative Neurosurgical Techniques, ed 2. New York, Grune & Stratton, 1986, pp 997–1001. 3 Holtzman RNN, Brust JCM, Hughes JEO, Dickinson PCT: Surgical management of infected intracranial aneurysms; in Schmidek HH, Sweet WH (eds): Operative Neurosurgical Techniques, ed 3. Philadelphia, Saunders, 1995, pp 1133–1153. 4 Hart RG, Kagan-Hallet K, Joerns SE: Mechanisms of intracranial hemorrhage in infective endocarditis. Stroke 1987;18:1048–1056. 5 Isaacs BA, van Dellen JR: Persistence of a mycotic aneurysm of the intracavernous carotid surgery. Surg Neurol 1986;26:577–580. 6 Roach MR, Drake CG: Ruptured cerebral aneurysms caused by microaneurysms. N Engl J Med 1965;273:240–244. 98 7 Rout D, Sharma A, Mohan PK, Rao VR: Bacterial aneurysms of the intracavernous carotid artery. J Neurosurg 1982;60:1236–1242. 8 Suwanwela C, Suwanwela N, Charuchanda S, Hongsaprabhas C: Intracranial mycotic aneurysms of extravascular origin. J Neurosurg 1972;36:552–559. 9 Mielke B, Weir B, Oldring D, von Westarp C: Fungal aneurysms: Case report and review of the literature. Neurosurgery 1981;9:578–582. 10 Molinari GF, Smith L, Goldstein MN: Pathogenesis of cerebral mycotic aneurysms. Neurology 1972;23:325–332. 11 Scheld WM, Sande MA: Endocarditis and intravascular infections; in Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R (eds): Principle and Practice of Infectious Diseases, ed 4. New York, Churchill Livingstone, 1995, pp 74–783. 12 Blackwood W, Corsellis JAN: Vascular disease of the nervous system; in Greenfield’s Neuropathology. Edinburgh, Arnold, 1976, p 139. 13 Bohmfalk GL, Story JL, Wissinger JP, Brown WE Jr: Bacterial intracranial aneurysm. J Neurosurg 1978;48:369–382. 14 Frazee JB, Cahan LD, Witner J: Bacterial intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg 1980;53: 633–641. Pediatr Neurosurg 2001;35:94–98 15 Brust JCM, Dickinson PCT, Hughes JEO, Holtzman RNN: The diagnosis and treatment of cerebral mycotic aneurysms. Ann Neurol 1990;28:238–246. 16 Whitaker LA, Munro IR, Salyer KE, Jackson IT, Ortiz-Monasterio F, Marchac D: Combined report of problems and complications in 793 craniofacial operations. Plast Reconstr Surg 1979;64:198–203. 17 Murray JE, Mulliken JB, Kaban LB, Blefer M: Twenty-year experience in maxillofacial surgery: An evaluation of early surgery on growth, function and body image. Ann Surg 1979;190: 320–331. 18 Matthews D: Craniofacial surgery – Indications, assessment and complications. Br J Plast Surg 1979;32:96–105. 19 Siegel JD, Israele V: Infectious complications of craniofacial surgery in children. Rev Infect Dis 1989;11:9–15. 20 Wolfe SA, Morrison G, Page LK, Berkowitz DDS: The monobloc frontofacial advancement: Do the pluses outweigh the minuses? Plast Reconstr Surg 1993;91:977–987. Uchiyama/Brockmeyer/Cherny/Jacobs/ Walker Copyright: S. Karger AG, Basel 2001. Reproduced with the permission of S. Karger AG, Basel. Further reproduction or distribution (electronic or otherwise) is prohibited without permission from the copyright holder.