JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE slurred speech. Pyrexia is absent.3 The cranial nerve symptoms are frequently, but not always, preceded by nausea, vomiting and abdominal cramps, especially after ingestion of contaminated foods. Incubation periods of between 3 hours and 54 days have been reported4 but 12–72 hours is often quoted. The clinical diagnosis of botulism is confirmed by injection of the patient’s serum into a laboratory animal, which then shows signs of neurotoxicity. Seven serotypes of the toxin are known, but only types A, B and E have been consistently responsible for botulism in man and trivalent antitoxin directed at these is the treatment of choice. Prompt treatment is crucial since, once the toxin has blocked neurotransmission at a synapse, antitoxin will have no effect on that synapse. Even a suspicion of botulism demands treatment with antitoxin, without waiting for a laboratory test. Recovery from the neurotoxic injury depends on the regeneration of neuromuscular junctions, which may take many months and is often incomplete. The implementation of ventilatory support has reduced the mortality from 60–70% in the early twentieth century to around 20% more recently.5 Even with the diagnosis of botulism, our patient’s progression within 45 minutes from an alert ambulatory state to respiratory arrest is hard to explain. We suspect that his earlier symptoms of weakness and somnolence reflected increasing compromise of his tidal exchange, culminating in the hypoxia/hypercardia that precipitated the arrest. Previously unseen and unpredicted routes of infection with botulinal toxin have emerged. Intravenous and nasal routes from recreational drugs ‘cut’ with contaminated soil particles and ‘inadvertent’ botulism in patients being treated with botulinal toxin for dystonias and cosmetic procedures8 have been reported. The possibility of the use of C. botulinum and its toxin as a weapon for bio-terrorism is considered both ‘real and frightening’.2,9 REFERENCES 550 1 Davis LE. Botulism. Curr Treat Options Neurol 2003;5:23–31 2 Arnon SS, Schechter R, Inglesby TV, et al. Botulinum toxin as a biological weapon: medical and public health management. JAMA 2001;285:1059–70 3 Gao QY, Huang YF, Wu JG, Liu HD, Xia HQ. A review of botulism in China. Biomed Environ Sci 1990;3:326–36 4 Larson HE. In: Warrell DA, Cox TM, Firth JD, Benz EJ Jr, eds. Oxford Textbook of Medicine, Vol. 1, 4th edn. 2003:551–3 5 Brett M. Botulism in the United Kingdom. Eurosurveillance 1999;4:9–11 6 Galazka A, Przybylska A. Surveillance of foodborne botulism in Poland: 1960–1998. Eurosurveillance 1999;4:60–72 7 Shapiro RL, Hatheway C, Swerdlow DL. Botulism in the United States: a clinical and epidemiologic review. Ann Intern Med 1998;129:221–8 8 Cherington M. Clinical spectrum of botulism. Muscle Nerve 1998;21:701–10 9 Whitby M, Street AC, Ruff TA, Fenner F. Biological agents as weapons 1: smallpox and botulism. Med J Aust 2002:176:431–3 Volume 96 November 2003 An aneurysm is born Kyo Niijima MD PhD J R Soc Med 2003;96:550–551 When a de novo intracranial saccular aneurysm is detected at a site where angiography was previously negative, the interval between angiographies is usually a matter of years1,2 rather than days. CASE HISTORY A woman of 76 with a history of hypertension developed headache with mild disturbance of consciousness. There was no personal or family history of inflammatory, collagen or cerebrovascular disease. On neurological examination there were no localizing features and laboratory data were all within the normal range. Urgent cranial CT revealed diffuse subarachnoid haemorrhage in the interpeduncular and ambient cisterns, and a magnetic resonance angiogram disclosed a single aneurysm, 12 mm in diameter, at the bifurcation of the basilar artery (Figure 1). Eight days later, the patient suddenly vomited and became comatose with neck rigidity. 30 minutes after this, CT revealed a dense subarachnoid haemorrhage localized in the left sylvian fissure. Next day the basilar artery aneurysm, which was then thought to be responsible for both vascular events, was successfully occluded by endovascular coiling. At that time a new aneurysm (Figure 2), 10 mm in diameter, was observed at the bifurcation of the left middle cerebral artery; the artery itself was not clearly visualized owing to vasospasm. Because of the patient’s clinical state (semicomatose and dyspnoeic) the new aneurysm was left untreated. 7 days later, magnetic resonance angiography showed the left middle cerebral artery to be completely occluded proximal to the aneurysm, which was no longer visible (Figure 3). Thereafter the patient remained stuporose with a right hemiplegia. COMMENT The shortest reported interval between an angiography and the demonstration of a de novo aneurysm at further angiography is 47 days.3 In the present case the interval was 9 days. The arteriographic appearance was suggestive of a true saccular aneurysm rather than a mycotic, dissecting or arteriosclerotic aneurysm. Department of Neurosurgery, Shiga National Hospital, 255 Gochi-cho, Yokaichi, Shiga 527-8505, Japan JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE Volume 96 November 2003 second portion of the left middle cerebral artery are clearly seen in the first magnetic resonance angiogram. Moreover, on examination of the published work4–6 I could find no report of false-negative magnetic resonance angiography for an aneurysm greater than 10 mm in diameter. On this evidence I conclude that this aneurysm did not exist at the time of initial study 9 days earlier. REFERENCES Figure 1. Initial MR angiogram. A single aneurysm is seen at the bifurcation of the basilar artery (arrow) 1 Matheus MG, Castillo M. Development of de novo aneurysm. Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:709–10 2 Tonn J, Hoffman O, Hoffmann E, et al. ‘‘De novo’’ formation of intracranial aneurysms: who is at risk? Neuroradiology 1999;41:674–9 3 Yasuhara T, Tamiya T, Sugiu K, et al. De novo formation and rupture of an aneurysm. Case report. J Neurosurg 2002;97:697–700 4 Schuierer G, Huk WJ, Laub G. Magnetic resonance angiography of intracranial aneurysms: comparison with intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography. Neuroradiology 1992;35:50–4 5 Okuhara M, Kiyosue H, Yamashita M, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance angiography for cerebral aneurysms in correlation with 3D-digital subtraction angiographic images. A study of 133 aneurysms. Stroke 2002;33:1803–8 6 Jager HR, Mansmann U, Hausmann O, et al. MRA versus digital subtraction angiography in acute subarachnoid haemorrhage: a blinded multireader study of prospectively recruited patients. Neuroradiology 2000;42:313–26 Aortic root replacement in pregnancy Figure 2. Left internal carotid digital subtraction arteriogram 9 days later. A de novo saccular aneurysm is seen at the bifurcation of the left middle cerebral artery (arrow) Natasha Khan FRCS James Clarke FRCA 2 Charles Pumphrey FRCP 1 Marjan Jahangiri FRCS J R Soc Med 2003;96:551–552 When complex cardiac operations become necessary during pregnancy, timing is crucial to survival of the fetus. CASE HISTORY Figure 3. MR angiogram 16 days after initial subarachnoid haemorrhage. The left middle cerebral artery is completely occluded proximal to the aneurysm, which is no longer visible Could the middle cerebral artery aneurysm have been missed at the original magnetic resonance angiography? Digital subtraction arteriography is certainly more sensitive; however, a basilar bifurcation aneurysm and the first and A woman of 31, in the 10th week of her first pregnancy, reported palpitations. She was tall, with fingers and toes unusually long for her family, and had ‘double-jointed’ thumbs. She was also short-sighted and her hearing was poor. There was no medical or family history of note. The pregnancy had followed 3 years of infertility treatment. Aortic regurgitation was diagnosed clinically, and she met Departments of Cardiac Surgery, 1Cardiology, and 2Cardiovascular Anaesthesia, St George’s Hospital NHS Trust, London SW17 0QT, UK Correspondence to: Marjan Jahangiri FRCS, Department of Cardiac Surgery, St George’s Hospital, Blackshaw Road, Tooting, London SW17 0QT, UK E-mail: marjan.jahangiri@stgeorges.nhs.uk 551