HHS Public Access Author manuscript Author Manuscript Am J Occup Ther. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2015 March 10. Published in final edited form as: Am J Occup Ther. 2011 ; 65(2): 161–168. Improved Function After Combined Physical and Mental Practice After Stroke: A Case of Hemiparesis and Apraxia Andy J. Wu, MOT, OTR/L [PhD candidate] Department of Occupational Therapy Education, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, Mail Stop 2003, Kansas City, KS Author Manuscript Jeff Radel, PhD [Associate Professor] Department of Occupational Therapy Education and Research, and Associate, Kansas Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City Brenda Hanna-Pladdy, PhD [Research Faculty, Landon Center on Aging, and Assistant Professor] Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City. Keywords Author Manuscript activities of daily living; apraxia, ideomotor; mental processes; paresis; stroke; task performance and analysis Stroke is the third most common cause of death and a leading cause of disability in the United States: It is estimated that 795,000 people experience new or recurrent stroke each year (Lloyd-Jones et al., 2009). Upper-extremity hemiparesis after stroke is a significant disabling consequence of stroke and the condition most commonly treated by occupational therapists (Radomski & Trombly, 2008), because it compromises the ability to perform valued activities of daily living (ADLs). Most studies to date have directed treatment efforts toward hemiparesis, with little consideration given to comorbid disorders that may influence potential rehabilitation benefit. Author Manuscript Ideomotor apraxia (IMA) is a common disorder after left hemisphere stroke, and it has implications for functioning in everyday life. It has been defined as a disorder of learned skilled movements that cannot be attributed to other common stroke deficits, such as primary motor or sensory impairments or language comprehension difficulties (De Renzi, 1989; Rothi & Heilman, 1997). Indirect evidence has suggested that IMA influences functioning in everyday life, as revealed in a positive association between severity of IMA and dependence in daily living skills (Bjørneby & Reinvang, 1985; Hanna-Pladdy, Heilman, & Foundas, 2003; Sundet, Finset, & Reinvang, 1988). Patients with IMA after left hemisphere stroke display spatial and temporal errors in movement trajectories that subsequently affect efficient manipulation of objects in the environment that is required for awu@kumc.edu. Wu et al. Page 2 Author Manuscript independence (Foundas et al., 1995; Hanna-Pladdy et al., 2003). Few studies, however, have examined rehabilitation of apraxia. Although studies have shown efficacy in the treatment of apraxia (Smania et al., 2006; Smania, Girardi, Domenicali, Lora, & Aglioti, 2000), most have used single-case designs (Butler, 2000; Maher, Rothi, & Greenwald, 1991; Pilgrim & Humphreys, 1994), and little evidence has indicated that treatment generalizes in the natural environment beyond the training paradigm. Systematic reviews of apraxia treatment have suggested that evidence is insufficient to support or refute treatment of apraxia and that development of treatment paradigms is in its infancy (Buxbaum et al., 2008; West, Bowen, Hesketh, & Vail, 2008). Despite evidence of the influence of apraxia on daily functioning, few studies have considered the impact of apraxia on motor rehabilitation efforts. Author Manuscript Mental practice is a technique used to enhance physical performance in which a person rehearses a motor task cognitively, in the absence of physical movements. Early studies with healthy people have reported increases in strength (Shelton & Mahoney, 1978; Tynes & McFatter, 1987), endurance (Lee, 1990), and precision and aim (Murphy & Woodfolk, 1987; Wrisberg & Anshel, 1989) when mental practice and physical practice are used in combination. Within the past decade, mental practice has been suggested for use in rehabilitative settings ( Jackson, Lafleur, Malouin, Richards, & Doyon, 2001; Page, 2001; Sharma, Pomeroy, & Baron, 2006). Author Manuscript Research involving mental practice has focused on people with stroke, and several earlier studies have suggested that mental practice appears to reduce impairment and improve motor function in acute, subacute, and chronic stroke (Liu, Chan, Lee, & Hui-Chan, 2004b; Page, 2000; Page, Levine, & Leonard, 2005; Page, Levine, Sisto, & Johnston, 2001b). Case studies have noted specific improvements in functional grip and grasp tasks (Page et al., 2001a), gait speed and range of motion of knee (Dickstein, Dunsky, & Marcovitz, 2004), and a foot-sequencing task (Jackson, Doyon, Richards, & Malouin, 2004). Consistent with these data, studies also reported increased affected arm use (Page et al., 2005) and function (Liu, Chan, Lee, & Hui-Chan, 2004a). Mental practice is most effective when combined with overt physical practice of tasks (Bachman, 1990; Gentili, Papaxanthis, & Pozzo, 2006; Sidaway & Trzaska, 2005; Yágüez et al., 1998). In fact, a randomized, placebo-controlled trial by Page, Levine, & Leonard (2007) concluded that the addition of mental practice to conventional motor therapy significantly decreased impairment and increased movement in the more-affected arm. Recent systematic reviews have also asserted that mental practice as an additional therapy may provide benefits for recovery after stroke (Braun, Beurskens, Borm, Schack, & Wade, 2006; Zimmermann-Schlatter, Schuster, Puhan, Siekierka, & Steurer, 2008). Author Manuscript The presence of IMA with hemiparesis could conceivably limit the rehabilitation benefit of otherwise efficacious treatment interventions. We evaluated whether combined physical and mental practice would increase functional performance and self-perception of performance in a patient with hemiparesis and concomitant IMA after stroke. This study is of particular interest to occupational therapists, because patients after stroke may present with comorbid disorders that exacerbate interference with the ability to live independently and to engage in meaningful occupation. Am J Occup Ther. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2015 March 10. Wu et al. Page 3 Author Manuscript Method Patient Selection Author Manuscript Inclusion/exclusion criteria were based on prior research (Page, Levine, & Hill, 2007; Page, Levine, & Leonard, 2007; Page et al., 2005). Potential candidates were screened from the University of Kansas Medical Center’s stroke registry using the following inclusion criteria: (1) age ≥18 yr and <75 yr; (2) single stroke experienced >6 mo before enrollment; (3) ability to actively flex at least 10° from neutral at the more-affected wrist and the metacarpophalangeal and interphalangeal joints of two digits; (4) presence of apraxia as indicated with <70% on a revised abbreviated version of the Florida Apraxia battery gestureto-verbal command task (Hanna-Pladdy, Heilman, & Foundas, 2001; Hanna-Pladdy et al., 2003); (5) absence of dementia, as indicated by a score of ≥24 on the Mini-Mental State Examination (Folstein, Folstein, & McHugh, 1975). Exclusion criteria were (1) history of >1 stroke; (2) excessive pain in the more-affected arm, as defined by a score of ≥4 on a 10point visual analog scale; (3) history of concurrent, unstable medical condition; and (4) current participation in any rehabilitation or drug studies. Case Description Author Manuscript The patient was a 44-yr-old White man who experienced a single stroke 7 mo before enrollment. His past medical history is significant for a patent foramen ovale. On admission to a local hospital, a computed tomography scan revealed an acute ischemic infarct in the distribution of the distal left middle cerebral and left anterior cerebral artery. He received approximately 30 days of inpatient rehabilitation (3 hr/day, 5 days/wk), including concurrent speech, physical, and occupational therapy. He is a right-handed, native English speaker with 14 yr of formal education. At the time of initial assessment, the patient reported problems with writing, math, and more hemiparesis in the right arm than in the right leg. Instruments Author Manuscript The Arm Motor Ability Test (AMAT; Kopp et al., 1997) is a 13-item test that measures deficits in ADLs. The AMAT is a valid, stable, and reliable scale, and it correlates positively with other stroke-specific functional scales (Kopp et al., 1997). It rates ADLs according to a Functional Ability Scale (FAS; 0 = does not attempt to use more-affected arm; 1 = moreaffected arm does not participate functionally, however attempt is made to use more-affected arm; 2 = more-affected arm is used for minor readjustments or as a helper/stabilizer in bilateral tasks; 3 = movement is influenced by synergy, performed very slowly, or with effort; 4 = movement is close to normal, but slightly slower; may lack precision and fluidity; 5 = movement appears normal or comparable to less-affected arm). AMAT tasks include ADLs such as use of a knife and fork, eating with a spoon, combing hair, and tying shoelaces. Time to complete each task is recorded to the nearest tenth of a second. Although FAS scores and time-to-complete tasks were obtained for each task, summed scores were used in our analysis. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM; Carswell et al., 2004) is a semistructured interview used to identify occupational performance problems. It is confirmed as being useful in helping to guide treatment. The COPM has been reported to be Am J Occup Ther. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2015 March 10. Wu et al. Page 4 Author Manuscript a valid, reliable, clinically useful, and responsive outcome measure for occupational therapists and researchers (Carswell et al., 2004). The assessment records the client’s responses to questions in three main categories: self-care, productivity, and leisure. The client is then asked to rate the importance of each item on a scale ranging from 1 to 10 (1 = not important at all; 10 = extremely important). Once the top five activities are determined, each is rated according to perceived performance (1 = not able to do it; 10 = able to do it extremely well) and satisfaction with performance (1 = not satisfied at all; 10 = completely satisfied). Performance and satisfaction scores are summed and divided by the number of problems identified (5), and this total score is used in the analysis. This subjective measure detects and tracks changes in the client’s own perception of performance and satisfaction. Author Manuscript Similar to protocols in previous investigations, an abbreviated version of the Florida Apraxia battery gesture-to-verbal command task was used to assess the severity of IMA (HannaPladdy et al., 2001, 2003). The patient used only the ipsilesional upper extremity during testing, so that motor impairment did not influence apraxia performance. The patient was asked to pantomime or gesture a set of 10 transitive tasks (e.g., “show me how to use a hammer to drive a nail into a wall”). Two trained judges scored responses on a severity scale ranging from 0 to 6 (0 = no response, unrecognizable, 1 to 2 = severely degraded, 3 = moderately degraded, 4 to 5 = mild impairment, 6 = perfect). The number of errors was considered in determining severity of IMA; lower scores indicated greater severity. Percentages were derived by subtracting the number of errors from the total possible, then dividing by the total possible. Procedures Author Manuscript After obtaining informed consent, approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Kansas Medical Center, a research team member administered the AMAT and COPM (PRE). Postassessments occurred immediately after intervention (POST1) and again 4 wk after intervention ended (POST2). POST2 determined whether treatment benefit persisted in the absence of intervention. Intervention consisted of physical and mental practice of two specific tasks: reaching for and grasping a cup and turning pages in a book. Of the mental practice tasks previously studied (Page, Levine, & Hill, 2007; Page et al., 2001a, 2005), these tasks were chosen because they are common activities, do not require use of the dominant hand, and involve different types of movements. The intervention took place 3 times per week in 60-min sessions for 6 consecutive wk. The patient practiced (1) reaching and grasping a cup for the first 3 wk and (2) turning pages in a book for the remaining 3 wk. Author Manuscript Physical Practice The first 30 min of each session involved physical practice of the task. The patient practiced tasks with his moreaffected arm using actual objects (i.e., cups and books). During this time, we graded the task to appropriately challenge the patient (e.g., began by reaching for an empty cup, later moved to a cup half-full of water, and finally used a full cup). Interventions included obtaining and moving a cup to and from surfaces at various heights, transferring liquids from container to cup, and practicing larger activities encompassing the target task Am J Occup Ther. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2015 March 10. Wu et al. Page 5 Author Manuscript (e.g., preparing and drinking a cup of tea). Whole-task practice and part-task practice were incorporated into treatment. Part-task practice consisted of decomposing the target task into a sequence of smaller steps and focusing practice on the smaller steps that the patient found difficult. Rest periods were included as needed or as requested by the patient, particularly before beginning the mental practice. Mental Practice Author Manuscript The second 30 min of each session consisted of mental practice corresponding to physical practice (i.e., mental practice of reaching for and grasping a cup after physical practice of the same task). Guided mental practice using audiotape for instructions was used, because this approach has been used in previous studies for people with stroke who exhibit hemiparesis or hemiplegia (Page, Levine, & Hill, 2007; Page, Levine, & Leonard, 2007; Page, Levine, Sisto, & Johnston, 2001b; Page et al., 2001a, 2005). Mental practice occurred in a quiet room; the patient was seated and listened to a 30-min mental practice audio-tape. The initial 5-min segment of the tape encouraged a progressive relaxation of muscles as the patient imagined experiencing a relaxing environment (e.g., a warm beach). The next 20min segment consisted of actual mental practice of the specific task practiced that day in therapy (i.e., mental practice of reaching for a cup after physically practicing reaching for a cup). The mental practice audiotape emphasized both visual and kinesthetic information while guiding the patient through all steps necessary to perform the actual movement. The final 5-min segment allowed the patient to reorient to the surrounding environment. The patient was encouraged to listen to the mental practice audiotape in its entirety without disruption. The therapy session for that day concluded when the audiotape ended. Results Author Manuscript During the course of the intervention, the patient complained of minor fatigue, increased frustration with more challenging tasks, and boredom. Regardless, the patient attended all treatment sessions, was agreeable to treatment suggestions, and reported actively engaging in each mental practice session. Comparison of AMAT and COPM scores before and after intervention was used to determine change in functional performance and self-perception of performance. Author Manuscript Before intervention, the patient exhibited decreased efficiency in performing ADLs, as evidenced by AMAT scores (Table 1). Scores from the COPM reflected lower perceived performance and satisfaction than the patient’s performance on the AMAT indicated. The patient reported diminished performance in tasks such as clipping his nails, managing finances, and woodworking, along with difficulty with driving and with doing laundry (Table 2). In addition, low satisfaction scores with his current performance were recorded for all tasks identified in the COPM. The patient presented with moderate-to-severe IMA, which was determined by a gesture-to-verbal command score of 31 of 60 (51.67%). After intervention, the patient demonstrated improvements in functional performance as measured by the AMAT, specifically with tasks involving reaching and bringing items toward the body such as the knife-and-fork task, eating a sandwich, eating with a spoon, drinking from a mug, combing hair, using the telephone, and wiping up spilled water. Am J Occup Ther. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2015 March 10. Wu et al. Page 6 Author Manuscript Composite AMAT data are presented in Table 1. The composite FAS component score of the AMAT before intervention was 79, compared with 95 at POST1. The composite time taken to complete all AMAT tasks decreased. The patient required 302.9 s to complete all tasks before the intervention and 211.7 s after the intervention. Scores obtained 4 wk after completion of the intervention (POST2) are also notable, because the FAS score improved to 102 and the time required to complete all tasks decreased to 183.1 s. Author Manuscript Self-perception of performance (COPM) scores reflected outcomes similar to those on the AMAT. The patient reported improved ability in clipping nails, managing finances, and participating in woodworking activities at POST1 (Table 2). Satisfaction scores associated with the performance of these tasks also increased. The changes continued to be evident at POST2, with slightly improved scores in some areas; however, the driving and laundry goals identified by the patient showed no change from PRE to POST1 or POST2. Gesture-to-verbal command scores indicated the continued presence of IMA at all assessment time points. The percentages derived from scores were 51% at PRE to 60% at POST1 and 63.3% at POST2. Discussion Author Manuscript The primary purpose of this single-case report was to examine change in functional performance of ADLs and self-perception of performance in someone with concurrent hemiparesis and IMA after stroke. After physical with mental practice, the patient showed increases in measures of functional performance and self-perception of performance, despite persistent IMA. We assessed apraxia severity by evaluating change in scores on the gestureto-verbal command test, and the patient exhibited persistent IMA with scores clinically unchanged from PRE to POST1 and POST2. The observed changes in the AMAT revealed improvements in functional ability scores associated with decreased time needed to complete tasks at POST1 (Table 1). This patient demonstrated an improved ability to bring objects from lower surfaces to higher ones (i.e., tasks involving primarily elbow flexion with some shoulder flexion), perhaps because one of the training tasks involved practicing bringing a cup toward the mouth. Improved fine motor abilities were also noted, as evaluated by AMAT tasks involving picking objects up from a table’s surface. Author Manuscript Although an increase in FAS scores of the AMAT was observed, the patient exhibited decreased FAS scores in some tasks at POST1. A composite decrease in time was observed, even though the patient took longer to complete certain tasks. These findings are important, given the relationship between FAS and time, two components of the AMAT. The most desirable outcome in the present setting is to obtain a higher FAS score with decreased time (an inverse relationship). The possibility of a direct relationship (i.e., increased FAS with increased time or decreased FAS with decreased time), however, must be considered. In this study, the patient demonstrated a direct relationship of FAS and time on multiple occasions. As additional effort was exerted to achieve a higher FAS score, the time required to Am J Occup Ther. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2015 March 10. Wu et al. Page 7 Author Manuscript complete the task increased. This relationship was observed in 7 of 11 total tasks and may underlie some changes observed in FAS scores and time. Examining the subcomponents of AMAT tasks did not reveal a consistent pattern or type of task that displayed this relationship. Moreover, most bilateral tasks exhibited this relationship, suggesting that perhaps bilateral integration during two-handed motor tasks plays a role in both quality and timing of such tasks. Despite variability among individual AMAT items, composite AMAT scores do identify an inverse relationship (an increase in FAS score associated with a decrease in time), supporting a therapeutic benefit for this intervention as described by these outcome measures. Author Manuscript Author Manuscript COPM scores also improved from PRE to POST1. The patient reported a perceived increased ability to perform some activities, whereas others remained unchanged. Of the five activities listed in Table 2, three showed positive change in scores on both performance and satisfaction, because the patient was able to readily engage in those activities. The patient reported inadequate balance to carry laundry up and down a flight of stairs and, thus, chose not to participate in this activity. In addition, the patient required physician’s approval to resume driving; in this case, permission was not granted until a later date. Accordingly, COPM scores accurately reflected the patient’s circumstances. The laundry and driving tasks, however, were not appropriate problems for gauging improvements from the intervention. Other changes in scores from the COPM are positive because the patient reported increased confidence and ability to perform the activities. Although increased selfperception of and satisfaction with performance are important, such perceptions should ideally be substantiated by a comparable increase in functional performance. The scores from the AMAT and COPM indicate that the patient experienced an increase in both functional performance and self-perception of performance. Scores obtained at POST2 from the AMAT and COPM were compared with scores from POST1 to assess sustained changes in functional performance and self-perception of performance. The patient did not partake in any form of rehabilitation during the 4 wk between POST1 and POST2, including the treatment intervention described in this study. In the absence of the treatment intervention, the patient demonstrated improvements in scores obtained 4 wk after completion of the intervention phase of the study, suggesting that the patient continued to improve on the primary outcome measures. Author Manuscript The changes noted on AMAT scores are clinically relevant. Improvements revealed that the patient was more able to perform tasks at POST1 and POST2 than at PRE. In addition, the patient demonstrated increased efficiency with the tasks, as indicated by higher FAS scores associated with decreased time. Although the patient did not demonstrate clinically important changes between assessment time points on the COPM (designated as two or more points), a steady increase in scores is evident across time. The effect of IMA on rehabilitation has been neglected, despite the fact that 30%–50% of patients with left hemisphere stroke display persistent IMA (De Renzi, Motti, & Nichelli, 1980; Donkervoort, Dekker, van den Ende, Stehmann-Saris, & Deelman, 2000; Kertesz & Ferrio, 1984). In the current study, the patient exhibited persistent skilled movement deficits Am J Occup Ther. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2015 March 10. Wu et al. Page 8 Author Manuscript (i.e., IMA) at all assessment points yet was able to demonstrate improvements in the AMAT and COPM. This finding accords with previous work suggesting that patients with IMA are able to benefit from traditional rehabilitation, although their improvement may not be comparable to that of patients without IMA (Unsal-Delialioglu, Kurt, Kaya, Culha, & Ozel, 2008). The results in Unsal-Delialioglu et al. (2008) should be carefully considered, however, because the study failed to define and control for type of rehabilitation intervention. The current study overcomes this limitation by using a specific rehabilitation intervention (i.e., physical with mental practice) to study whether a person can improve on functional measures after stroke despite persistent IMA. Author Manuscript Taken together, these findings are relevant, because therapists and clinical researchers must remember that IMA is indeed a persistent disorder after stroke. More important, the presence of IMA in addition to hemiparesis may reduce effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions deemed successful in people with hemiparesis alone. This patient’s extent of apraxia did not hinder his ability to make clinically significant improvements on measures of functional performance and self-perception of performance after treatment consisting of physical with mental practice of tasks. Limitations and Future Research Our preliminary data support the concept that a patient may derive benefit from treatment of hemiparesis even if IMA persists. It is unclear, however, to what degree IMA influences rehabilitation potential and whether the patient in this study would have demonstrated greater gains without comorbid IMA. Further research is warranted to explore the potential efficacy of using mental practice (efficacious motor rehabilitation techniques) in light of comorbid IMA or other disorders that may directly affect functional motor performance. Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Although the patient’s improvements were marked, a single-case report prohibits inferences from results obtained for an individual. In addition, with this design, we cannot be certain that the patient would have made greater functional gains in the absence of IMA. A training effect could account for the improvements observed, limiting a clear attribution to the intervention applied here. Future studies should ensure adequate ability to perform mental practice using appropriate measures. The same investigator performed all treatment and assessments, which contributes to potential bias of results. As suggested by Sunderland and Shinner (2007), IMA may be a hidden barrier to rehabilitation; therefore, future studies should include larger sample sizes with proper control groups (e.g., patients with either hemiparesis or IMA) to further examine the effects of IMA on rehabilitation benefit. Despite these shortcomings, the findings of this study represent an initial step toward considering treatment of patients with stroke presenting with multiple disorders that may affect their potential to benefit from rehabilitation efforts. ◆ Acknowledgments This study describes change in functional performance and self-perception after participation in combined training with physical practice followed by mental practice. The patient was a 44-yr-old White man who experienced a single left ischemic stroke 7 mo before enrollment in the study. He engaged in physical and mental practice of two functional tasks: (1) reaching for and grasping a cup and (2) turning pages in a book with the more-affected arm. Practice took place 3 times per week during 60-min sessions for 6 consecutive wk. Primary outcome measures were Am J Occup Ther. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2015 March 10. Wu et al. Page 9 Author Manuscript the Arm Motor Ability Test (AMAT) and the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM). An abbreviated version of the Florida Apraxia Battery gesture-to-verbal command test approximated severity of ideomotor apraxia. After intervention, the patient demonstrated increased functional performance (AMAT) and self-perception of performance (COPM) despite persistent ideomotor apraxia. The results of this single-case report indicate functional benefit from traditional rehabilitation techniques despite comorbid, persisting ideomotor apraxia. References Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Bachman K. Using mental imagery to practice a specific psychomotor skill. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing. 1990; 21:125–128. [PubMed: 2112173] Bjørneby ER, Reinvang IR. Acquiring and maintaining self care skills after stroke: The predictive value of apraxia. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 1985; 17:75–80. [PubMed: 4023662] Braun SM, Beurskens AJ, Borm PJ, Schack T, Wade DT. The effects of mental practice in stroke rehabilitation: A systematic review. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2006; 87:842–852. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.02.034. [PubMed: 16731221] Butler J. Rehabilitation of severe ideomotor apraxia using sensory stimulation strategies: A single case experi mental design study. British Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2000; 63:319–328. Buxbaum LJ, Haaland KY, Hallett M, Wheaton L, Heilman KM, Rodriguez A, et al. Treatment of limb apraxia: Moving forward to improved action. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2008; 87:149–161. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31815e6727. [PubMed: 18209511] Carswell A, McColl MA, Baptiste S, Law M, Polatajko H, Pollock N. The Canadian Occupational Perfor mance Measure: A research and clinical literature review. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2004; 71:210–222. De Renzi, E. Apraxia. In: Boller, F.; Grafman, J., editors. Handbook of neuropsychology. Vol. 2. Elsevier; Amsterdam: 1989. p. 245-263. De Renzi E, Motti F, Nichelli P. Imitating gestures: A quantitative approach to ideomotor apraxia. Archives of Neurology. 1980; 37:6–10. [PubMed: 7350907] Dickstein R, Dunsky A, Marcovitz E. Motor imagery for gait rehabilitation in post stroke hemiparesis. Physical Therapy. 2004; 84:1167–1177. [PubMed: 15563257] Donkervoort M, Dekker J, van den Ende E, Stehmann Saris JC, Deelman BG. Prevalence of apraxia among patients with a first left hemisphere stroke in rehabilitation centres and nursing homes. Clinical Rehabilitation. 2000; 14:130–136. [PubMed: 10763789] Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini Mental State”: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research. 1975; 12:189–198. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026 6. [PubMed: 1202204] Foundas AL, Macauley BL, Raymer AM, Maher LM, Heilman KM, Gonzalez Rothi LJ. Ecolog ical implications of limb apraxia: Evidence from mealtime behavior. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society. 1995; 1:62–66. doi: 10.1017/S1355617700000114. [PubMed: 9375210] Gentili R, Papaxanthis C, Pozzo T. Improvement and generalization of arm motor performance through motor imagery practice. Neuroscience. 2006; 137:761–772. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience. 2005.10.013. [PubMed: 16338093] Hanna Pladdy B, Heilman KM, Foundas AL. Cortical and subcortical contributions to ideomotor apraxia: Analysis of task demands and error types. Brain. 2001; 124:2513–2527. doi: 10.1093/ brain/124.12.2513. [PubMed: 11701604] Hanna Pladdy B, Heilman KM, Foundas AL. Ecological implications of ideomotor apraxia: Evidence from physical activities of daily living. Neurology. 2003; 60:487–490. [PubMed: 12578932] Jackson PL, Doyon J, Richards CL, Malouin F. The efficacy of combined physical and mental practice in the learning of a foot sequence task after stroke: A case report. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair. 2004; 18:106–111. doi: 10.1177/0888439004265249. [PubMed: 15228806] Jackson PL, Lafleur MF, Malouin F, Richards C, Doyon J. Potential role of mental practice using motor imagery in neurologic rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2001; 82:1133–1141. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2001.24286. [PubMed: 11494195] Am J Occup Ther. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2015 March 10. Wu et al. Page 10 Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Kertesz A, Ferro JM. Lesion size and location in ideomotor apraxia. Brain. 1984; 107:921–933. [PubMed: 6206911] Kopp B, Kunkel A, Flor H, Platz T, Rose U, Mauritz KH, et al. The Arm Motor Ability Test: Re liability, validity, and sensitivity to change of an instrument for assessing disabilities in activities of daily living. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 1997; 78:615–620. doi:10.1016/ S0003-9993(97)90427-5. [PubMed: 9196469] Lee C. Psyching up for a muscular endurance task: Effects of image content on performance and mood state. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 1990; 12:66–73. Liu KP, Chan CC, Lee TM, Hui Chan CW. Mental imagery for promoting relearning for people after stroke: A randomized controlled trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2004a; 85:1403–1408. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.12.035. [PubMed: 15375808] Liu KP, Chan CC, Lee TM, Hui Chan CW. Mental imagery for relearning of people after brain injury. Brain Injury. 2004b; 18:1163–1172. doi: 10.1080/02699050410001671883. [PubMed: 15545212] Lloyd Jones D, Adams R, Carnethon M, De Simone G, Ferguson TB, Flegal K, et al. American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2009 update: A report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Sub committee. Circulation. 2009; 119:e21–e181. doi: 10.1161/ CIRCULATIONAHA.108.191261. [PubMed: 19075105] Maher LM, Rothi LG, Greenwald ML. Treatment of gesture impairment: A single case. American Speech Hearing Association. 1991; 33:195. Murphy SM, Woodfolk R. The effect of cognitive interventions on competitive anxiety and performance on a fine motor skill task. International Journal of Sport Psychology. 1987; 18:152– 166. Page SJ. Imagery improves upper extremity motor functions in chronic stroke patients with hemiplegia: A pilot study. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health. 2000; 20:200–215. Page SJ. Mental practice: A promising restorative tech nique in stroke rehabilitation. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation. 2001; 8:54–63. doi: 10.1310/7WDU 2P4U V2EA 76F8. [PubMed: 14523738] Page SJ, Levine P, Hill V. Mental practice as a gateway to modified constraint induced movement therapy: A promising combination to improve function. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2007; 61:321–327. [PubMed: 17569389] Page SJ, Levine P, Leonard AC. Effects of mental practice on affected limb use and function in chronic stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2005; 86:399–402. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.10.002. [PubMed: 15759218] Page SJ, Levine P, Leonard A. Mental practice in chronic stroke: Results of a randomized, placebo controlled trial. Stroke. 2007; 38:1293–1297. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000260205.67348.2b. [PubMed: 17332444] Page SJ, Levine P, Sisto SA, Johnston MV. Mental practice combined with physical practice for upper limb motor deficit in subacute stroke. Physical Therapy. 2001a; 81:1455–1462. [PubMed: 11509075] Page SJ, Levine P, Sisto S, Johnston MV. A randomized efficacy and feasibility study of imagery in acute stroke. Clinical Rehabilitation. 2001b; 15:233–240. doi: 10.1191/026921501672063235. [PubMed: 11386392] Pilgrim, E.; Humphreys, GW. Rehabilitation of a case of ideomotor apraxia. In: Riddoch, MJ.; Humphreys, GW., editors. Cognitive neuropsychology and cognitive rehabilitation. Erlbaum; Hove, England: 1994. p. 271-285. Radomski, MV.; Trombly, CA. Occupational therapy for physical dysfunction. 6th. Lip pincott Williams & Wilkins; Baltimore: 2008. Rothi, LG.; Heilman, KM. Apraxia: The neuropsychology of action. Psychology Press; London: 1997. Sharma N, Pomeroy VM, Baron JC. Motor imagery: A backdoor to the motor system after stroke. Stroke. 2006; 37:1941–1952. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000226902.43357.fc. [PubMed: 16741183] Shelton TO, Mahoney MK. The content and effect of “psyching up” strategies in weightlifters. Cognitive Therapy and Research. 1978; 2:275–284. doi: 10.1007/BF01185789. Sidaway B, Trzaska AR. Can mental practice increase ankle dorsiflexor torque. Physical Therapy. 2005; 85:1053–1060. [PubMed: 16180954] Am J Occup Ther. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2015 March 10. Wu et al. Page 11 Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Smania N, Aglioti SM, Girardi F, Tinazzi M, Fiaschi A, Cosentino A, et al. Rehabilitation of limb apraxia improves daily life activities in patients with stroke. Neurology. 2006; 67:2050–2052. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000247279.63483.1f. [PubMed: 17159119] Smania N, Girardi F, Domenicali C, Lora E, Aglioti S. The rehabilitation of limb apraxia: A study in left brain damaged patients. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2000; 81:379–388. doi: 10.1053/mr.2000.6921. [PubMed: 10768524] Sunderland A, Shinner C. Ideomotor apraxia and functional ability. Cortex. 2007; 43:359–367. doi: 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70461-1. [PubMed: 17533759] Sundet K, Finset A, Reinvang I. Neuropsycholog ical predictors in stroke rehabilitation. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. 1988; 10:363–379. doi: 10.1080/01688638808408245. [PubMed: 3403700] Tynes LL, McFatter RM. The efficacy of “psyching” strategies on a weightlifting task. Cognitive Therapy and Research. 1987; 11:327–336. doi: 10.1007/BF01186283. Unsal Delialioglu S, Kurt M, Kaya K, Culha C, Ozel S. Effects of ideomotor apraxia on functional outcomes in patients with right hemiplegia. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research. 2008; 31:177–180. [PubMed: 18467934] West C, Bowen A, Hesketh A, Vail A. Inter ventions for motor apraxia following stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 20082008 CD004132. Wrisberg CA, Anshel MH. The effect of cog nitive strategies on the free throw shooting performance of young athletes. Sport Psychologist. 1989; 3:95–104. Yágüez L, Nagel D, Hoffman H, Canavan AG, Wist E, Hömberg V. A mental route to motor learning: Improving trajectorial kinematics through imagery training. Behavioural Brain Research. 1998; 90:95–106. doi: 10.1016/S0166-4328(97)00087-9. [PubMed: 9520217] Zimmermann-Schlatter A, Schuster C, Puhan MA, Siekierka E, Steurer J. Efficacy of motor imagery in post stroke rehabilitation: A systematic review. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation. 2008; 5:8. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-5-8. [PubMed: 18341687] Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Am J Occup Ther. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2015 March 10. Wu et al. Page 12 Table 1 Author Manuscript Arm Motor Ability Test: Composite Scores Before and After Intervention Component PRE POST1 POST2 Functional Ability Scale 79 95 102 Time to complete tasks, s 302.9 211.7 183.1 Note. PRE = before intervention; POST1 = immediately after intervention; POST2 = 4 wk after intervention ended. Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Am J Occup Ther. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2015 March 10. Wu et al. Page 13 Table 2 Author Manuscript COPM Scores Before and After Intervention PRE Occupational Performance Problem POST1 POST2 COPM–P COPM–S COPM–P COPM–S COPM–P COPM–S Clipping nails 1 1 5 5 7 7 Driving 1 1 1 1 1 1 Managing finances 4 1 5 2 6 2 Woodworking 4 1 5 1 7 2 Laundry 1 2 1 2 1 2 COPM–P 2.5 3.4 4.4 COPM–S 1.2 2.2 2.8 Note. PRE = before intervention; POST1 = immediately after intervention; POST2 = 4 wk after intervention ended; COPM–P = Canadian Occupational Performance Measure–Performance subscale; COPM–S = Canadian Occupational Performance Measure–Satisfaction subscale. Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Am J Occup Ther. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2015 March 10.