Images in… Sunil Kumar,1 Priya Singh ‍ ‍,2,3 Surya Pratap Singh,1 Manish Kumar2 1 Radiodiagnosis, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India 2 Radiodiagnosis, Mayo Institute of Medical Sciences, Barabanki, Uttar Pradesh, India 3 Radiodiagnosis, King George Medical College, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India Correspondence to Dr Priya Singh; ​singhpriya2861990@​gmail.​com Accepted 13 May 2022 DESCRIPTION A teenage girl presented with reports of recurrent headache, recurrent episodes of generalised seizures and weakness of the right upper and lower limbs for 1 year. Her previous history and family history were unremarkable. She was conscious and oriented to time, place and person on examination. Mild sensory and motor deficits were present in both the right upper and lower limbs (motor strength grade 4/5). The MRI of the brain (figures 1 and 2) revealed a spongiform mixed signal intensity lesion involving the left frontal-­parietal lobe (measuring 12.2×5.3×7 cm) involving both white and grey matter. The lesion consists of multiple tiny (less than 1 cm) T1-­weighted (T1W) and T2-­weighted (T2W) hyperintense cystic areas surrounded by T1W/ T2W hypointense rim representing haemosiderin. Associated mild volume loss was seen in involved lobes, leading to left lateral ventricle undulated appearance. Few similar smaller lesions were seen in the midbrain extending into the floor of the third ventricle and cerebral aqueduct, causing obstruction and mild upstream hydrocephalus (figure 1E and F). Another similar small lesion was seen in the left thalamus. On susceptibility-­weighted imaging (SWI) (figure 2), diffuse blooming was seen in the entire left frontal-­parietal lobe, with small foci of Figure 2 MRI brain. Susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI) images in the axial plane (A, B, C) show diffuse blooming in the entire left frontal-­parietal lobe, with small foci of blooming in the midbrain. blooming in the midbrain and left thalamus. No diffusion restriction was seen on diffusion weighted imaging. A diagnostic digital subtraction angiography revealed mild irregularity of cortical branches of the left middle cerebral artery and cortical veins with no developmental venous anomaly, arteriovenous malformation or fistula. Based on these imaging findings, a diagnosis of diffuse and multifocal brain cavernoma was made. Lesions in the midbrain were causing compression at the level of the third ventricle and cerebral aqueduct, leading to mild upstream hydrocephalus. Near-­complete (more than 90%) surgical resection of the cavernoma was done using a microsurgical approach and functional mapping. A thin rim of the residual lesion was left adjacent to the motor cortex, left thalamus and midbrain. A ventriculoperitoneal shunt was placed in the left lateral ventricle. She recovered gradually with mild residual haemiparesis on the right side. Histopathological examination of the lesion showed multiple vascular channels lined by single layer of dysplastic epithelium interspersed with minimal astroglial brain tissue. These findings were consistent with radiological diagnosis of gaint infiltrative cavernoma. Cerebral cavernoma refers to intracranial vascular malformation of developmental origin. Patient’'s perspective © BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2022. No commercial re-­use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. To cite: Kumar S, Singh P, Singh SP, et al. BMJ Case Rep 2022;15:e249691. doi:10.1136/bcr-2022249691 Figure 1 MRI brain. T2-­weighted images in axial (A, B) and T1 weighted images in axial (C, D) planes demonstrates diffuse mixed signal intensity lesions (white arrows) involving the left frontal-­parietal lobe having multiple tiny T2 hyperintense cystic areas with a few of them showing T1 hyperintensity on T1 weighted images (black arrow). T1 weighted images in axial (E) and T2 weighted images in sagittal planes (F) show T1 hyperintense and T2 hypointense lesion in the midbrain (red arrow) obstructing at the level cerebral aqueduct and floor of third ventricle leading to mild hydrocephalus. My daughter has been unwell for a long time. Previously her seizures were controlled with medications, but gradually they were uncontrollable. Therefore, we decided to take her to a higher centre. Doctors in the hospital have done a few investigations where they found multiple blood-­filled lesions in the brain. They discussed different treatment options and all the risks and benefits of treatment. Finally, she underwent surgery. Her seizures are well controlled now, although there is some weakness in her limbs. Kumar S, et al. BMJ Case Rep 2022;15:e249691. doi:10.1136/bcr-2022-249691 1 BMJ Case Rep: first published as 10.1136/bcr-2022-249691 on 20 May 2022. Downloaded from http://casereports.bmj.com/ on April 18, 2024 by guest. Protected by copyright. Unusual case of giant cerebral infiltrative cavernoma causing obstructive hydrocephalus Images in… ► Cerebral cavernoma is usually round, lobulated hamartomatous lesions with normal brain parenchyma between them. On imaging, they are well-­defined lesions showing blood in different stages producing popcorn appearance with surrounding T2 hypointense rim. ► Infiltrative giant cavernoma is a rare and atypical type of cavernoma showing diffuse infiltration of brain parenchyma involving multiple lobes. ► Mass effect and obstructive hydrocephalus can be rarely seen in infiltrative cavernomas. These malformations consist of clusters of variable-­ sized abnormal capillaries containing slow-­flowing blood.1 The incidence of cavernous angioma is around 0.5% in the population.1 Both sporadic and familial forms are described. Giant cerebral cavernoma refers to cavernoma of more than 6 cm.2 On imaging, cavernoma usually appears as a well-­defined round lobulated lesion with large cystic cavernous areas showing mixed signal intensity with a peripheral hypointense rim.3 However, in the present case, lesion was diffuse, infiltrative and large (12 cm in maximum diameter). Cystic spaces were tiny with no normal intervening brain parenchyma visualised. However, the presence of dense and confluent blooming favoured the diagnosis of cavernoma.4 Another unusual feature in this case was presence of obstructive hydrocephalus caused by cavernoma in mibrain bulging into the aqueduct. Previously, only one similar case was reported in the literature where lesions showed an infiltrative pattern in the right cerebral haemisphere.2 Contributors PS and SK share first authorship. Data were compiled and the report was written by PS. SK helped in the inception of the report, image collection and final review. The manuscript revision and the final correction were done by SPS and MK. Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-­for-­profit sectors. Competing interests None declared. Patient consent for publication Consent obtained from parent(s)/guardian(s) Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed. Case reports provide a valuable learning resource for the scientific community and can indicate areas of interest for future research. They should not be used in isolation to guide treatment choices or public health policy. ORCID iD Priya Singh http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0110-4242 REFERENCES 1 Goldstein HE, Solomon RA. Epidemiology of cavernous malformations. Handb Clin Neurol 2017;143:241–7. 2 Lawton MT, Vates GE, Quiñones-­Hinojosa A, et al. Giant infiltrative cavernous malformation: clinical presentation, intervention, and genetic analysis: case report. Neurosurgery 2004;55:E988–95. 3 Wang KY, Idowu OR, Lin DDM. Radiology and imaging for cavernous malformations. Handb Clin Neurol 2017;143:249–66. 4 Sparacia G, Speciale C, Banco A, et al. Accuracy of SWI sequences compared to T2*-weighted gradient echo sequences in the detection of cerebral cavernous malformations in the familial form. Neuroradiol J 2016;29:326–35. Copyright 2022 BMJ Publishing Group. All rights reserved. For permission to reuse any of this content visit https://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/permissions/ BMJ Case Report Fellows may re-use this article for personal use and teaching without any further permission. Become a Fellow of BMJ Case Reports today and you can: ► Submit as many cases as you like ► Enjoy fast sympathetic peer review and rapid publication of accepted articles ► Access all the published articles ► Re-use any of the published material for personal use and teaching without further permission Customer Service If you have any further queries about your subscription, please contact our customer services team on +44 (0) 207111 1105 or via email at support@bmj.com. Visit casereports.bmj.com for more articles like this and to become a Fellow 2 Kumar S, et al. BMJ Case Rep 2022;15:e249691. doi:10.1136/bcr-2022-249691 BMJ Case Rep: first published as 10.1136/bcr-2022-249691 on 20 May 2022. Downloaded from http://casereports.bmj.com/ on April 18, 2024 by guest. Protected by copyright. Learning points