Sakurai et al. Journal of Medical Case Reports https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-023-03992-0 (2023) 17:285 Journal of Medical Case Reports Open Access CASE REPORT Improved language function for post‑stroke aphasia in the long term following repeated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and intensive speech‑language‑hearing therapy: a case report Yoshihiro Sakurai1*, Masahiro Abo1, Saki Terajima1, Saho Ikeda1, Kensuke Ohara1 and Takuya Hada1 Abstract Background There have been no papers reporting improvement in language function and changes in cerebral blood flow following repeated use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in combination with intensive speech-language-hearing therapy. This case report concerns the efficacy of repeated use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and intensive speech-language-hearing therapy for a certain patient suffering from aphasia following stroke, plus the findings of the cerebral blood flow measurements. Case presentation The patient was a 71-year-old right-handed Japanese male who developed fluent aphasia following a left middle cerebral artery stroke. He underwent repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and intensive speech-language-hearing therapy five times in total. The repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation was applied to right inferior frontal gyrus at the frequency of 1 Hz plus 2 hours per day of intensive speech-language-hearing therapy. The patient’s language function was evaluated in the short term and long term. Cerebral blood flow was measured with single photon emission computed tomography scan. As a result, in the short term, the patient’s language function improved especially during the initial hospitalization. In the long term, it improved gradually and stabilized. Cerebral blood flow was increased in the right hemisphere. Conclusions The findings of the study indicate that the repeated use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and intensive speech-language-hearing therapy may be effective in improving and preserving language function and increasing cerebral blood flow for aphasia following stroke. Keywords Stroke, Aphasia, Rehabilitation, Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, Intensive speech-languagehearing therapy *Correspondence: Yoshihiro Sakurai y.saku.37a@gmail.com 1 Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3‑25‑8, Nishi‑Shimbashi, Minato‑ward, Tokyo 105‑8461, Japan Background Around 21% to 40% of stroke patients sustain permanent aphasia [1]. Stroke survivors with acquired language disability are generally thought to reach a plateau within a year of stroke onset, after which their residual language abilities stabilize [2]. Treatment with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for post-stroke aphasia © The Author(s) 2023. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creat​iveco​mmons.​org/​licen​ses/​by/4.​0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creat​iveco​ mmons.​org/​publi​cdoma​in/​zero/1.​0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. Sakurai et al. Journal of Medical Case Reports (2023) 17:285 facilitates recovery of language function by regulating cerebral cortex excitability. The department of rehabilitation medicine of The Jikei University School of Medicine started performing rTMS therapy for patients with aphasia following stroke in 2008, and reported the efficacy of the therapy [3–10]. The latest international rTMS guidelines 2020 recommend rTMS therapy in post-stroke aphasia as level B of evidence (probable efficacy) [11]. There have been no reports in which the repeated use of rTMS in combination with intensive speech-language-hearing therapy (iST) was performed in patients with post-stroke aphasia together with evaluation of the treatment course by cerebral blood flow (CBF) measurements. We performed rTMS and iST as an intensive rehabilitation treatment five times for a patient with post-stroke aphasia, by which long-term language function recovered. The findings, as well as cerebral blood flow measurements by single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) scan, are reported herein. Case presentation The patient was a 71-year-old Japanese male who was naturally right-handed, with no history of being forced to use his right hand. He was a university graduate and was an executive officer of a company. His past medical history included atrial fibrillation, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus. Having developed left middle cerebral artery stroke, the patient was treated conservatively because thrombus retrieval therapy and thrombolysis were not yet available in Japan at that time. Seven days after onset, when his condition had stabilized, he started Page 2 of 9 speech-language-hearing therapy (ST). Two months after onset, the patient was discharged from hospital and continued ST on an outpatient basis. However, there was little improvement in speech and language function, so he visited the department of rehabilitation medicine at The Jikei University School of Medicine at 9 months after stroke onset. The findings at the initial visit were as follows: the patient exhibited good awareness with no paralysis in gross motor function. The cognitive function score by functional independence measurement (FIM) was 31/35 points. The scores were 6, 4, 7, 7, and 7 in the order of communication (comprehension, expression) and social cognition (social interaction, problem solving, and memory), respectively. The brain imaging test using T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the head showed low signal regions from the left temporal lobe to supramarginal gyrus and inferior parietal lobule (Fig. 1). The Standard Language Test of Aphasia (SLTA) results showed a greater language loss function in terms of ability to speak and write compared with aural and reading comprehension. His utterance was fluent in short sentences. No anarthria was observed, but phonemic paraphasia and neologism were observed for verbal expression. He had phonological spelling errors in writing. The neuropsychological test findings showed that the Raven’s Colored Progressive Matrices (RCPM) score was 26/36 points (the average in the 70s being 26.9 points). He underwent inpatient intensive rehabilitation treatment consisting of rTMS and intensive ST (iST) five times in total (at 10 months, 20 months, 27 months, Fig. 1 MRI T1 weighted image of the patient’s head. T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the head showed low signal regions from the left temporal lobe to supramarginal gyrus and inferior parietal lobule. MRI: Magnetic resonance imaging Sakurai et al. Journal of Medical Case Reports (2023) 17:285 35 months, and 47 months after stroke onset). Each duration of hospital stay was 13 days. He continued to undergo ST periodically on an outpatient basis. Table 1 shows therapeutic regimens during hospitalization. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) The rTMS was performed using a eight-shaped coil with a diameter of 70 mm and MagPro R30 Stimulator (MagVenture Company, Denmark). The location of rTMS stimulation was right inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) [6, 12]. The motor threshold was measured at which movements of the first dorsal interosseous muscle of the left upper limb were visually observed when the right primary motor cortex was stimulated. The stimulation intensity was set at 90% of the motor threshold. The stimulation frequency was set at a low frequency of 1 Hz. The stimulation time was 40 minutes per session. A total of 2400 pulses of rTMS were applied per day. He underwent rTMS session once a day with a total of 12 sessions, excluding Sunday, during hospitalization. Intensive speech‑language‑hearing therapy (iST) He underwent iST with a total of 120 minutes per day during hospitalization. One-on-one ST training with the intent of improving phonological awareness was performed by a speech-language-hearing therapist. The main training included reading aloud short sentences written only in the Japanese syllabary characters and phonological manipulation tasks (phonological extraction, mora counting, written naming, dictation, and adding Japanese syllabary characters by providing the framework of the mora). He encouraged voluntary training in the wards.Upon discharge from the hospital, he and his family received instruction about communication methods from the speech-language-hearing therapist. Page 3 of 9 Evaluation of language function The patient’s language function was evaluated by the Standard Language Test of Aphasia (SLTA), the Supplementary Tests for Standard Language Test of Aphasia (SLTA-ST), the Japanese version of Western Aphasia Battery (J-WAB), and the Japanese version of Token Test (J-Token Test). The speech-language-hearing therapist scored each test according to the prescribed scoring method. The patient underwent the naming task of the SLTA-ST, the shadowing task of the J-WAB and the J-Token Test as the short-term evaluation for language functions at both the time of hospitalization and hospital discharge 2 weeks later. He also received the SLTA as long-term assessment for language functions during hospitalization and at 3 months after hospital discharge. The SLTA is widely used as the standard language test for people who are native speakers of Japanese [6, 13]. The SLTA is designed to evaluate language functions including utterance, naming, shadowing, auditory comprehension, reading comprehension, writing, and calculation. Four domains of the SLTA (listening, speaking, reading, and writing) were assessed. The scores of SLTA subtests were converted into Z-scores by utilizing the mean and standard deviation. The mean Z-score of listening, speaking, reading, and writing of the SLTA by each domain, as well as the mean of Z-scores of the SLTA four domains were calculated. The SLTA-ST consists of more complicated tasks than SLTA and is designed to detect symptoms of mild language disability, which the SLTA cannot [5]. The naming task of the SLTA-ST was performed using 80 words. The J-WAB is designed to measure linguistic skills and auditory comprehension. The shadowing task of the J-WAB was performed with 100 points as the maximum score. The J-Token Test is used to detect slight language comprehension deficits; severity of aphasia correlates to the test score. The maximum score of the J-Token Test was 165 points. Table 1 Patient schedule for 2-week rTMS in combination with iST hospitalization AM Monday Tuesday–Saturday Sunday Monday–Friday Saturday Admission rTMS None rTMS rTMS Individual ST Individual ST Individual ST Lunch break PM Lunch break Evaluation at admission Individual ST Individual ST Evaluation at discharge rTMS Voluntary training Voluntary training Discharge Individual ST Language function was evaluated on admission and discharge. ST was performed for a total 2 h per day. Patients received rTMS at 1 Hz for 2400 pulses per day for a total of 14,400 pulses per week rTMS repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, ST speech-language-hearing therapy Sakurai et al. Journal of Medical Case Reports (2023) 17:285 Page 4 of 9 Single photon emission‑computed tomography (SPECT) and laterality index (LI) The patient’s regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) was measured with SPECT scan. 99mTc-ethyl cysteine dimer (99mTc-ECD) was used as a tracer. The SPECT scan was performed three times in total (at 20 months, 30 months, and 47 months after stroke onset). The patient was injected intravenously with 99mTc-ECD (600 MBq) and the SPECT scan was performed 20 minutes later. The conditions at SPCET scanning included eyes closed resting states in the decubitus position. The SPECT imaging software used for quantitative analysis included threedimensional stereotactic regions of interest template (3DSRT) and fine stereotactic regions of interest template (FineSRT). The 3DSRT and FineSRT are designed to quantitatively calculate CBF in the region of interest (ROI). The rCBF was set at the mean CBF of each ROI (mL/100 g/minute) [19]. A difference of CBF in right and left cerebral hemispheres was calculated using rCBF of language-related ROI as laterality index (LI) as follows [7]: LI = [(right rCBF − left rCBF) / right rCBF + left rCBF ] CBF in the affected side of the left cerebral hemisphere decreased. This means the higher LI value is, the more CBF in the right cerebral hemisphere increases compared with the CBF in the left hemisphere. Results of language function and cerebral blood flow The patient completed treatment without adverse events. Language function gradually improved over the long term, was maintained, and then stabilized. His speech improved from word level to short sentences, and the frequency of phonemic paraphasia decreased. Table 2 and Fig. 2 show transitions in the short-term evaluation during hospitalization (naming task of the SLTA-ST, shadowing task of the J-WAB and the J-Token Test). His scores for J-WAB improved from 28 to 50 points, and from 97 to 137 points for the J-Token Test during the initial hospitalization. Improvement in short-term language function during hospitalization was remarkable in the initial hospitalization and stabilized after repeated hospitalization. Table 3 and Fig. 3 show the transitions in the long-term language function evaluation (Z-score of the SLTA) for 3 months after hospital discharge. The mean Z-scores of four domains, listening, speaking, reading, and writing, improved from 53.8 to 58.1 points over the course of a long period of time from 10 to 51 months after the onset of stroke. The Z-score of each SLTA domain and the mean Z-scores of the four SLTA domains improved simultaneously. The patient’s speaking and writing improved much more compared with listening and reading comprehension. LI increased, with CBF in right hemisphere increasing more than that of the left hemisphere. Table 4 shows transitions of rCBF in the parietal lobe, angular gyrus, and temporal lobe, as well as LI transitions using 3DSRT of the SPECT. Table 5 shows transitions of rCBF and LI in each language-related area using FineSRT of the SPECT. Discussion and conclusions Discussion The patient underwent intensive rehabilitation treatment consisting of rTMS in combination with iST several times, by which his language function improved. In short-term evaluation, his language function was markedly improved initially and stabilized after repeated hospitalization. In long-term evaluation, language function was initially improved in a stepwise manner, and after repeated hospitalization, it improved in a linear fashion and then stabilized. In a case report where intensive treatment with rTMS and iST was repeated four times, a stepwise improvement in the language function was noted. One study also reports that for rTMS in patients with non-fluent aphasia following stroke, low-frequency stimulation had a longer lasting effect on the language function than high-frequency stimulation [14]. It was furthermore found that short-term intensive ST improves language function in patients with aphasia in the chronic stage, after which it stabilizes it for an extended period Table 2 Evaluation of language function before and after 2-weeks rTMS in combination with iST Short-term evaluation of language function (for 2 weeks) 1st rTMS and iST 2nd TMS and iST 3rd TM and iST 4th TMS and iST 5th TMS and iST Before After Before After Before After Before After Before After SLTA-ST naming (80 points in total) 23 22 25 25 25 25 31 28 31 33 J-WAB shadowing (100 points in total) 28 50 66 66 65 56 65 74 82 76 J-Token Test (165 points in total) 97 139 127 138 135 119 119 141 128 125 As evaluation of language function before and after 2-weeks rTMS and iST, the naming task of the Supplementary Tests for Standard Language Test of Aphasia (SLTA-ST), the shadowing task of the Japanese version of Western Aphasia Battery (J-WAB), and the the Japanese version of Token Test (J-Token Test) were performed at each hospitalization Sakurai et al. Journal of Medical Case Reports (2023) 17:285 Page 5 of 9 Fig. 2 Evaluation of language function before and after 2-weeks repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in combination with intensive speech-language-hearing therapy. Transitions in the short-term evaluation during hospitalization (naming task of the Supplementary Tests for Standard Language Test of Aphasia, shadowing task of the Japanese version of Western Aphasia Battery and the Japanese version of Token Test) are shown. Improvement in short-term language function during hospitalization was remarkable in the initial hospitalization and stabilized after repeated hospitalization. Evaluation of language function is shown during hospitalization and 3 months after discharge. SLTA-ST: Supplementary Tests for Standard Language Test of Aphasia. J-WAB: Japanese version of Western Aphasia Battery. J-Token Test: Japanese version of Token Test. rTMS: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.iST: intensive speech-language-hearing therapy Table 3 Evaluation of language function during hospitalization and 3 months after discharge Long-term evaluation of language function (at 3 months) of SLTA Z-score Months 10 14 20 24 27 30 35 39 47 51 Listening 56.0 56.2 56.0 56.2 56.1 57.7 60.2 59.5 59.5 56.8 Speaking 51.0 53.7 50.8 54.4 52.3 54.1 54.9 54.0 55.7 56.1 Reading 57.1 57.8 57.1 57.8 57.1 57.7 59.2 59.2 59.2 59.2 Writing 54.7 55.3 54.7 55.3 51.5 54.2 56.5 58.2 57.2 61.0 Average 53.8 55.2 53.7 55.5 53.4 55.3 56.9 56.9 57.3 58.1 Language function was evaluated during rTMS and iST hospitalization and 3 months after discharge; Standard Language Test of Aphasia (SLTA) was used as long-term evaluation. “Listening,” “Speaking,” “Reading,” and “Writing” subtests were administered and scores were Z-scored. Z-score averages for the four SLTA regions were calculated of time [15]. Language function of our patient improved remarkably in the early stage, along with inpatient intensive rehabilitation therapy using rTMS in combination with iST; repeated intensive rehabilitation contributed to maintaining the improved language function for an extended period of time as well. Although an instant evaluation shows the language function reaches a plateau in the short term by repeated intensive rTMS and iST, the combination use of rTMS and iST has a long-term stabilizing effect on the language function. Thus, rTMS and iST should be continued if language function reaches a plateau in a short time. For our patient, low-frequency rTMS was applied to right IFG based on international rTMS guidelines at that time [16]. The latest international rTMS guidelines 2020 recommend low-frequency rTMS to right IFG in poststroke non-fluent aphasia [11]. This guideline, however, does not provide a consensus concerning the location of Sakurai et al. Journal of Medical Case Reports (2023) 17:285 Page 6 of 9 Fig. 3 The transitions in the long-term language function evaluation (Z-score of the Standard Language Test of Aphasia) are shown for 3 months after hospital discharge. The Z-score of each Standard Language Test of Aphasia domain and the mean Z-scores of the Standard Language Test of Aphasia four domains improved simultaneously. The patient’s speaking and writing improved much more compared with listening and reading comprehension. SLTA: Standard Language Test of Aphasia.rTMS: repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.iST: intensive speech-language-hearing therapy. Table 4 Regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) and laterality index (LI) in 3DSRT analysis rCBF in 3DSRT 20 30 Right Left 47 Right Left Months Right Left Parietal 34.48 23.65 34.67 22.05 39.30 23.15 Angular 37.40 33.56 38.14 33.27 42.68 34.83 Temporal 35.11 30.11 36.27 30.62 42.13 33.49 mL/100 g/min LI in 3DSRT 20 30 47 Parietal 0.1863 0.2225 0.2586 Angular 0.0541 0.0682 0.1013 Temporal 0.0767 0.0845 0.1143 Months SPECT images were quantitatively analyzed using three-dimensional stereotactic regions of interest template (3DSRT). The regions of interest (ROI) were defined for each language-related region, and the averaged regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) is shown rTMS stimulation in patients with fluent aphasia. Regarding stimulation frequency, 5 Hz or higher-frequency rTMS releases excitatory neurotransmitters, whereas 1 Hz or lower frequency rTMS releases inhibitory neurotransmitters. Thus, high-frequency rTMS upregulates neuronal activity, low-frequency rTMS downregulates it [17]. At present, it is unknown whether the right or left cerebral hemisphere is significant in terms of the recovery course of language functions in aphasia in the chronic stage [6, 10]. In patients with post-stroke aphasia, the activation of right IFG may contribute to the compensation for loss of language function and its reacquisition. On the other hand, a study reports that the compensatory ability of the right IFG was restricted in terms of the improvement of language function compared with the group with the function activated in the left IFG [18]. Thus, when lowfrequency rTMS with inhibitory neuronal activity is applied to right cerebral hemisphere, it may impair language function compensated by activating right cerebral Sakurai et al. Journal of Medical Case Reports (2023) 17:285 Page 7 of 9 Table 5 Regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) and laterality index (LI) in fineSRT analysis rCBF in fineSRT 20 30 Right Left 47 Right Left Right Months Left Inferior frontal gyrus 37.84 34.23 38.74 34.10 45.56 37.50 Superior parietal lobule 31.41 30.39 31.12 29.61 34.91 33.09 Inferior parietal lobule 36.49 19.89 37.06 17.67 41.91 17.56 Angular gyrus 37.52 33.44 38.25 33.16 42.81 34.66 Supramarginal gyrus 34.57 19.23 35.64 17.96 42.12 16.68 Superior temporal gyrus 34.59 28.01 35.54 28.47 42.60 31.80 Broca 38.47 34.57 38.14 34.29 45.03 36.69 Wernicke 37.68 29.83 38.69 29.53 45.65 31.69 Insula 40.46 32.53 42.00 32.21 47.59 36.55 mL/100 g/minute LI in 3DSRT 20 30 47 Inferior frontal gyrus 0.0501 0.0637 0.0970 Superior parietal lobule 0.0165 0.0249 0.0268 Inferior parietal lobule 0.2944 0.3543 0.4095 Angular gyrus 0.0575 0.0713 0.1052 Supramarginal gyrus 0.2851 0.3299 0.4327 Superior temporal gyrus 0.1051 0.1105 0.1452 Broca 0.0534 0.0532 0.1021 Wernicke 0.1163 0.1343 0.1805 Insula 0.1086 0.1319 0.1312 Months SPECT images were quantitatively analyzed with fine stereotactic regions of interest template (FineSRT). The regions of interest (ROI) were defined for each languagerelated region, and the averaged regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) is shown hemisphere in some cases, and may facilitate the activation of original language function of left cerebral hemisphere in other cases. In our patient, an exacerbation of language function was observed only for the instant evaluation at the third hospitalization and hospital discharge before and after low-frequency rTMS to right IFG. The short-term and long-term evaluation during the other four times of hospitalizations showed a favorable improvement in his language function. Our patient indicates that low-frequency rTMS to the right IFG may be effective, not only in patients with post-stroke non-fluent aphasia, but also in those with post-stroke fluent aphasia. In this case, low-frequency rTMS was applied to right IFG. When comparing the CBF in right and left cerebral hemispheres, an increased flow was observed in the right hemisphere. LI changes of rCBF are used for research on regulation and plasticity of neural circuit to evaluate the impact of rTMS on CBF [7]. The CBF was measured with SPECT scan by accumulation of radioisotope in the language-related area. rTMS for the treatment of post-stroke aphasia when used in combination with rehabilitation therapy promotes an improvement of language function. This paper reports research result on the effect of rTMS based on functional brain imaging [9]. However, even if an increased flow in the right cerebral hemisphere is observed, it does not necessarily mean that it upregulates the function in the right hemisphere, for which caution must be taken. In short, there is a possibility that neuronal functions may be suppressed by increasing the CBF in the stimulation area, as well as releasing inhibitory neurotransmitters. After the treatment with low-frequency rTMS was performed for our patient, the CBF in the stimulation site increased and his speaking and writing ability especially improved. For the relationship between the location of cerebral hemispheres and language function, left IFG is associated with language generation, and the posterior region is especially involved in phonological processing [19]. Also, the insular cortex mediates motor aspects of speech production. According to a study, functional MRI (fMRI) findings showed that right and left anterior insular cortex, which is involved in speech production, was activated in healthy people and that the middle portion of insula in the left hemisphere involved in speech Sakurai et al. Journal of Medical Case Reports (2023) 17:285 comprehension was activated [20]. While improved utterance was observed in our patient, a decrease in the approaching behaviors and phonemic paraphasia was observed, which was likely to be derived from the upregulated neuronal function in left IFG and left insular cortex, leading to the increase in the CBF in right IFG or right insular cortex on the SPECT images. The detailed mechanism of treatment with rTMS still remains unknown [21]. Further research is expected for the rTMS treatment and changes in the CBF in post-stroke aphasia. Our next challenge involves repeated high-frequency rTMS to right IFG in combination with iST to investigate the instant and long-term effects on the improvement of language function over time [10]. The compensation site associated with recovery of language function must, however, be studied using functional brain imaging, including fMRI, other than SPECT [6]. Conclusions The authors performed rTMS in combination with iST on a patient with post-stroke aphasia during hospitalization five times. rTMS was applied to right IFG at 1 Hz. His language function improved immediately, improved gradually over time, and stabilized in the latter stage. The CBF increased dominantly in right cerebral hemisphere. This article reports one case only, and the evaluation of CBF using the SPECT is also restricted. Further investigation is therefore required for the combined use of rTMS and iST on language function and CBF transition. Abbreviations rTMS Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation iST Intensive speech-language-hearing therapy CBF Cerebral blood flow SPECT Single photon emission computed tomography FIM Functional independence measure ST Speech-language-listening therapy MRI Magnetic resonance imaging SLTA Standard Language Test of Aphasia RCPM Raven’s coloured progressive matrices IFG Inferior frontal gyrus SLTA-ST Supplementary Tests for Standard Language Test of Aphasia J-WAB Japanese version of Western Aphasia Battery J-Token Test Japanese version of Token Test rCBF Regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) ECD Ethyl cysteine dimer 3DSRT Three-dimensional stereotactic regions of interest template FineSRT Fine stereotactic regions of interest template ROI Region of interest fMRI Functional MRI Acknowledgements The authors have no acknowledgments. Page 8 of 9 Author contributions YS, SI, and ST collected the data, drafted the manuscript, and reviewed the literature. TH edited the manuscript. KO collected the data and was involved in the speech-language-hearing therapy. MA reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Funding The authors report no funding. Data availability The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article. Declarations Ethics approval and consent to participate Written informed consent was obtained from the patient in our study. The purpose of this research was completely explained to the patient and they were assured that their information would be kept confidential by the researchers. Consent for publication Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent was provided for review to the Editor-in-Chief of this journal. Competing interests There are no conflicts of interests. Received: 31 December 2022 Accepted: 19 May 2023 References 1. Cichon N, Wlodarczyk L, Saluk-Bijak J, Bijak M, Redlicka J, Gorniak L, Miller E. Novel advances to post-stroke aphasia pharmacology and rehabilitation. J Clin Med. 2021;10:3778. https://​doi.​org/​10.​3390/​jcm10​173778. 2. Hope TMH, Leff AP, Prejawa S, Bruce R, Haigh Z, Lim L, Ramsden S, Oberhuber M, Ludersdorfer P, Crinion J, Seghier ML, Price CJ. Right hemisphere structural adaptation and changing language skills years after left hemisphere stroke. Brain. 2017;140:1718–28. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​brain/​ awx086. 3. Kakuda W, Abo M, Uruma G, Kaito N, Watanabe M. Low-frequency rTMS with language therapy over a 3-month period for sensory-dominant aphasia: case series of two post-stroke Japanese patients. Brain Inj. 2010;24(9):1113–37. https://​doi.​org/​10.​3109/​02699​052.​2010.​494587. 4. Kakuda W, Abo M, Kaito N, Watanabe M, Senoo A. Functional MRI-based therapeutic rTMS strategy for aphasic stroke patients: a case series pilot study. Int J Neurosci. 2010;120(1):60–6. https://​doi.​org/​10.​3109/​00207​ 45090​34456​28. 5. Kakuda W, Abo M, Momosaki R, Morooka A. Therapeutic application of 6-Hz-primed low-frequency rTMS combined with intensive speech therapy for post-stroke aphasia. Brain Inj. 2011;25(12):1242–8. https://​doi.​ org/​10.​3109/​02699​052.​2011.​608212. 6. Abo M, Kakuda W, Watanabe M, Morooka A, Kawakami K, Senoo A. Effectiveness of low-frequency rTMS and intensive speech therapy in poststroke patients with aphasia: a pilot study based on evaluation by fMRI in relation to type of aphasia. Eur Neurol. 2012;68(4):199–208. https://​doi.​ org/​10.​1159/​00033​8773. 7. Hara T, Abo M, Kobayashi K, Watanabe M, Kakuda W, Senoo A. Effects of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with intensive speech therapy on cerebral blood flow in post-stroke aphasia. Transl Stroke Res. 2015;6(5):365–74. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​ s12975-​015-​0417-7. Sakurai et al. Journal of Medical Case Reports 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. (2023) 17:285 Hara T, Abo M, Kakita K, Mori Y, Yoshida M, Sasaki N. The effect of selective transcranial magnetic stimulation with functional near-infrared spectroscopy and intensive speech therapy on individuals with post-stroke aphasia. Eur Neurol. 2017;77(3–4):186–94. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1159/​00045​ 7901. Hara T, Abo M. New treatment strategy using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for post-stroke aphasia. Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland). 2021;11(10):1853. https://​doi.​org/​10.​3390/​diagn​ostic​s1110​1853. Ohara K, Kuriyama C, Hada T, Suzuki S, Nakayama Y, Abo M. A pilot study verifying the effectiveness of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in combination with intensive speech-languagehearing therapy in patients with chronic aphasia. NeuroRehabilitation. 2021;49(3):459–67. https://​doi.​org/​10.​3233/​NRE-​210139. Lefaucheur JP, Aleman A, Baeken C, Benninger DH, Brunelin J, Di Lazzaro V, Filipović SR, Grefkes C, Hasan A, Hummel FC, Jääskeläinen SK, Langguth B, Leocani L, Londero A, Nardone R, Nguyen JP, Nyffeler T, Oliveira-Maia AJ, Oliviero A, Padberg F, Palm U, Paulus W, Poulet E, Quartarone A, Rachid F, Rektorová I, Rossi S, Sahlsten H, Schecklmann M, Szekely D, Ziemann U. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): an update (2014–2018). Clin Neurophysiol. 2020;131(2):474–528. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/j.​clinph.​2019.​ 11.​002. Ren CL, Zhang GF, Xia N, Jin CH, Zhang XH, Hao JF, Guan HB, Tang H, Li JA, Cai DL. Effect of low-frequency rTMS on aphasia in stroke patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(7):e102557. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1371/​journ​al.​pone.​01025​57. Kawanishi M, Kajikawa H, Yamamura K, Nomura E, Kajikawa M, Hihara R, Ogawa R, Nagasawa S. Aphasia following left putaminal hemorrhage. Statistical analysis of factors affecting prognosis. Neurol Res. 2002;24(8):817– 21. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1179/​01616​41021​01200​780. Hu XY, Zhang T, Rajah GB, Stone C, Liu LX, He JJ, Shan L, Yang LY, Liu P, Gao F, Yang YQ, Wu XL, Ye CQ, Chen YD. Effects of different frequencies of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in stroke patients with non-fluent aphasia: a randomized, sham-controlled study. Neurol Res. 2018;40(6):459–65. https://​doi.​org/​10.​5114/​fn.​2022.​118188. Doppelbauer L, Mohr B, Dreyer FR, Stahl B, Büscher V, Pulvermüller F. Long-term stability of short-term intensive language-action therapy in chronic aphasia: a 1–2 year follow-up study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2021;35(10):861–70. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1177/​15459​68321​10292​35. Lefaucheur JP, André-Obadia N, Antal A, Ayache SS, Baeken C, Benninger DH, Cantello RM, Cincotta M, de Carvalho M, De Ridder D, Devanne H, Di Lazzaro V, Filipović SR, Hummel FC, Jääskeläinen SK, Kimiskidis VK, Koch G, Langguth B, Nyffeler T, Oliviero A, Padberg F, Poulet E, Rossi S, Rossini PM, Rothwell JC, Schönfeldt-Lecuona C, Siebner HR, Slotema CW, Stagg CJ, Valls-Sole J, Ziemann U, Paulus W, Garcia-Larrea L. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Clin Neurophysiol. 2014;125(11):2150–206. https://​doi.​ org/​10.​1016/j.​clinph.​2014.​05.​021. Chen QM, Yao FR, Sun HW, Chen ZG, Ke J, Liao J, Cai XY, Yu LQ, Wu ZY, Wang Z, Pan X, Liu HY, Li L, Zhang QQ, Ling WH, Fang Q. Combining inhibitory and facilitatory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) treatment improves motor function by modulating GABA in acute ischemic stroke patients. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2021;39(6):419–34. https://​doi.​org/​10.​3233/​RNN-​211195. Winhuisen L, Thiel A, Schumacher B, et al. Role of the contralateral inferior frontal gyrus in recovery of language function in poststroke aphasia: a combined repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and positron emission tomography study. Stroke. 2005;36(8):1759–63. https://​doi.​org/​ 10.​1161/​01.​STR.​00001​74487.​81126.​ef. Klaus J, Hartwigsen G. Dissociating semantic and phonological contributions of the left inferior frontal gyrus to language production. Hum Brain Mapp. 2019;40(11):3279–87. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​hbm.​24597. Oh A, Duerden EG, Pang EW. The role of the insula in speech and language processing. Brain Lang. 2014;135:96–103. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/j.​ bandl.​2014.​06.​003. Chervyakov AV, Chernyavsky AY, Sinitsyn DO, Piradov MA. Possible mechanisms underlying the therapeutic effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015;9:303. https://​doi.​org/​10.​3389/​ fnhum.​2015.​00303. Page 9 of 9 Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Ready to submit your research ? Choose BMC and benefit from: • fast, convenient online submission • thorough peer review by experienced researchers in your field • rapid publication on acceptance • support for research data, including large and complex data types • gold Open Access which fosters wider collaboration and increased citations • maximum visibility for your research: over 100M website views per year At BMC, research is always in progress. Learn more biomedcentral.com/submissions